Camera: Leica M4-2, Film: Kodak Plus X 125 processed in Xtol 1+1.
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Comments
Anonymous said…
Bill, these are great! I always do love your work.
Do you know anything about working with IR film (true IR)? I have a roll in the 'fridge that I want to work with, but the last roll got ruined at the shop and the roll before that wasn't true IR, so I'm a bit nervous to take the last roll out.
Good question. What roll is it? I have never messed with IR film myself, what I do know is you need a deep red filter and you have to be really careful in handling, put simple load and unload the film at home in a windowless room.
Anonymous said…
Yes, I have an IR filter (that I dropped and it cracked. I can't see through it, but I wonder if it's still okay to use...) I also have a deep red filter. And I have a film loading bag (2 of them) so I'm in the clear there.
The film is Efke IR film. I'd love to pull it out the 'fridge and shoot with it...but I'm a little afraid to. I'd hate to have the roll ruined. The last roll was from a trip to Maine, so I was really disappointed when I got the call that they ruined the film and was sorry about it. They gave me free processing on the next roll of film, but still...
Hmm, you sending your black and white film to be processed? I process my own, if I screw up, it's my fault and not some else.
Anonymous said…
Yes, I send it out for processing. I moved and there's just no room here for processing negatives. I don't have anywhere I can put them where they can dry without threat of lint or something floating on to them. There's not much space for making the prints either, but at least with a print I only mess up one sheet of paper. With the negative it's kind of an out of luck thing if it gets messed up.
I might just have to switch to digital. I hate the idea because I have all these great film cameras, but I can't just not take pictures because I don't have a reliable place to process. There was a great film place where I used to live. They were real pros...can't find anything like that here :(.
My last adventures with Scewmount Barnack Leicas didn't end well, on the few occasions I tried my brother's IIIf and IIIg, I botched the loading and got 36 exposures on one frame. I was quite content to just shoot with my M3 and M4-2, even though I wanted to get a IIIg because Alex got dad's from the estate. Logic has no place shooting with a Barnack Leica, if the cliche film photography slows you down, working with a III series body is an exercise in zen. First you have deal with bottom loading, wind the film advance before adjusting shutter speed and be careful where you point your camea as bright sunlight can incinerate a rubberized silk shutter cloth instantly. That said, Joan at Burlington Camera had this red dial Leica IIIf from the mid 1950s with a pre war Elmar 50 F3.5 lens, on the used shelf, I saw it, handled the camera, and put it back. In a fit of camera GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) a few weeks later I came back in and bought the camera. I wonder if Joan...
I bought a bunch of Flic Film Elektra 100 after shooting a roll of Santa Color 100 late last fall down in Niagara on the Lake with my good Canon New F-1. I packed a two rolls gifting one roll to my brother Alex before heading south on vacation for a week. This time around my second adventure of Kodak Aero Color IV at a different time of the year. Again, I shot at "box speed" at 100 ISO only this time through my Nikon F3/T. This time I loved the results even more, not just because it went through a different camera system. I think back late last November there was more infrared light in the spectrum due the time of year thus influencing the colour cast of the Aero Color 1V. Shooting the second roll in late March gave me a lot more the look I adored. Due to the polyester base Aero Color IV is easy to scan, you can almost colour correct during the scanning process, reducing your work flow a bit at the other end in Lightroom. Again being a polyester base, you want to load...
I didn't need a NIkon FM2T but I got one. I already have both a chrome and black Nikon FM2N bodies but being not only an analogue photographer I'm also a Nikon collector. Ok, the FM3a's are getting a little out of hand in the used market. As you have read over the past few months I've been on a gear acquisition tear this is more a prize. James over at Casual Photophile wrote a great pieec back in 2019 on the camera , and pretty much shares what I think, yeah, you don't really need this camera but if you're a Nikon collector you want one. The FM2T was only made from 1993 to 1997 and is a rare beast in the grand scheme of things compared to the FM2n which was made from 1989 to 2001. What the FM2T is a lighter and tougher version of the FM2N. with a titanium outer housing, like a regular FM2n it feels great in my hand. This particular example was spot on with the meter and did not take one bad photo at all. Film wise I ran with Ilford Delta 100, I'm just tryi...
Comments
Do you know anything about working with IR film (true IR)? I have a roll in the 'fridge that I want to work with, but the last roll got ruined at the shop and the roll before that wasn't true IR, so I'm a bit nervous to take the last roll out.
The film is Efke IR film. I'd love to pull it out the 'fridge and shoot with it...but I'm a little afraid to. I'd hate to have the roll ruined. The last roll was from a trip to Maine, so I was really disappointed when I got the call that they ruined the film and was sorry about it. They gave me free processing on the next roll of film, but still...
I might just have to switch to digital. I hate the idea because I have all these great film cameras, but I can't just not take pictures because I don't have a reliable place to process. There was a great film place where I used to live. They were real pros...can't find anything like that here :(.